WellnessMats

Independent Lab
Testing Results

Comprehensive ASTM & AATCC testing by Precision Testing Laboratories — an A2LA-accredited facility.

14
Standard Tests
2
Collections
A2LA
Accredited
ASTM F2913-24

Slip Resistance

Coefficient of Friction measured with Neolite heel under 500N vertical force.

Dry
Supreme1.08
Connect1.24
Safety Min.≥ 0.42
Wet
Supreme0.85
Connect0.82
Safety Min.≥ 0.42
Both collections exceed ANSI/NFSI B101.1 — up to 3× required traction in dry conditions.
ASTM D3574 — TEST C

Compression Force Deflection

Force required to compress to 50% thickness — how firmly the mat supports body weight.

Supreme
81.7
kPa
0.43″
Thickness

Softer initial feel with excellent rebound — ideal for kitchen, salon, and retail environments.

Connect
81.7
kPa
0.41″
Thickness

Equal support density in a modular profile — versatile for commercial and industrial.

ASTM D3574 — TEST D

Compression Set

Shape recovery after 22 hours of continuous 50% compression.

Supreme
93.8%
Recovered
Only 6.24% permanent set
Connect
91.9%
Recovered
Only 8.06% permanent set
Your mat bounces back to over 90% of its original shape — even after a full day of compression.

What Is Compression Set?

Compression set measures how much of its original thickness a material fails to recover after being compressed for a sustained period. The standard test is ASTM D3574, Test D: the material is compressed to 50% of its thickness for 22 continuous hours, then allowed to recover for 30 minutes.

The result is expressed as a percentage of permanent deformation. A compression set of 10% means the material lost 10% permanently. A compression set of 50% means it recovered only half its cushion.

Lower compression set = better recovery. Under 10% means the mat feels virtually the same after months of daily use as it did day one.

What Happens When Compression Set Is High

PVC / Vinyl Mats

PVC mats typically exhibit 30–50% compression set within the first year. The cellular structure collapses permanently — you can see this as a visible body impression in the standing zone while the edges remain thick.

Nitrile Rubber Mats

Most rubber mats show 20–35% permanent set within 12–18 months. Degradation accelerates in warm environments near ovens or industrial equipment because heat softens the polymer chains that provide recovery.

Open-Cell Foam Composites

Open-cell foams can lose 40–60% of their cushion in as little as three months because the cell walls are thin and collapse under repetitive compression. They're functionally disposable.

The Polyurethane Difference

Closed-cell polyurethane deforms elastically rather than plastically — the cells compress and return to their original shape rather than collapsing. Under 10% permanent set means the mat delivers the same ergonomic support after a year of daily use that it provided on installation day.

Why This Matters for Total Cost of Ownership

Procurement time. Someone has to identify the need, source the product, process the PO, receive the delivery, and distribute the mats. Across a large facility, that's hours of labor per replacement cycle.

Disposal costs. PVC and rubber mats aren't recyclable in most municipal programs. They go to landfill.

Ergonomic risk window. Between when a mat starts losing cushion and when it gets replaced, workers are standing on a surface that no longer provides meaningful support. That's when musculoskeletal complaints increase and workers' comp exposure grows.

What to Ask Your Current Supplier

1. What is the compression set percentage after 22 hours at 50% deflection?Above 15% means noticeable cushion loss within a year. Above 30% means the mat is functionally spent in 6–9 months.
2. Was the test performed by an accredited third-party lab?In-house testing is common and unreliable. Look for A2LA or ISO 17025 accreditation.
3. Is the test data for the actual product or a raw material sample?Finished-product testing is what matters because manufacturing processes can degrade compression performance.
ASTM D3574 — TEST B1

Indentation Force Deflection

Force (lbs) to indent to 25% and 65% — revealing the support curve.

SupremeMaximum Comfort
@ 25% Deflection261.8 lbs
@ 65% Deflection1,043 lbs

Softer step-on with progressive support. Ideal for extended standing.

ConnectFirm Support
@ 25% Deflection381.7 lbs
@ 65% Deflection1,767 lbs

Immediate structural support under heavier loads. Ideal for commercial.

ASTM D3574 — TEST I

Dynamic Fatigue

Thickness lost after 80,000 repeated impacts.

Supreme
2.0%
thickness loss
Connect
1.9%
thickness loss
80,000
Impacts Tested
98%
Thickness Retained
0
Structural Failures
Exceptional Durability

How Dynamic Fatigue Testing Works

ASTM D3574, Test I subjects the mat to 80,000 repeated impacts using a weighted indenter that strikes the surface at a controlled force and frequency. The test measures thickness loss after all 80,000 cycles and whether any structural failures occur.

If a worker takes roughly 100 steps on a mat per day, 80,000 cycles represents approximately 3–4 years of continuous daily use compressed into a single laboratory session.

What Failure Looks Like

Progressive Thinning

The mat slowly gets thinner and harder. By the time it's noticeable to workers, the mat may have already lost 15–25% of its original thickness — providing meaningfully less energy return and shock absorption.

Structural Cracking

In layered mats, repeated impacts create micro-fractures at the layer boundary. Once the surface is compromised, moisture, dirt, and bacteria enter the foam core — accelerating every other failure mode simultaneously.

Internal Cell Collapse

Open-cell foam mats are particularly vulnerable. The cell walls don't have time to recover between rapid impacts, and they eventually fracture permanently — unlike compression set, which is a single sustained load.

Why This Test Matters More Than Most Buyers Realize

Compression set gets more attention because "my mat went flat" is intuitive. But dynamic fatigue is the better predictor of real-world lifespan because it simulates actual use conditions rather than a single worst case.

A mat might have acceptable compression set but still fail under dynamic fatigue because repeated impact cycling creates different stress patterns than sustained compression. The two tests are complementary — responsible manufacturers publish both.

A mat that loses 10–15% thickness per year enters a gray zone where it's "still there" but no longer performing. Workers feel the difference before management sees it. That's where injury risk quietly climbs.
AATCC 197 / AATCC 79 / AATCC 81

Moisture & Liquid Resistance

Three independent tests confirm total moisture impermeability.

💧
AATCC 197
Vertical Wicking
0.00 mm
Zero liquid migration over 30 min — water stays where it falls.
🛡
AATCC 79
Surface Absorbency
60+ sec
Water droplets remained on the surface without absorption.
AATCC 81
pH Neutrality
7.4 – 8.5
Compatible with standard cleaners and gentle on skin.
Spills stay on the surface — the mat core remains completely dry, preventing bacterial growth.

What Happens When Mats Absorb Moisture

Bacterial and Fungal Growth

When liquid enters a mat's core, it creates a warm, dark, moist environment — the ideal breeding ground for bacteria, mold, and fungus. The mat might look clean on top while harboring colonies inside that produce the unmistakable sour odor facilities managers know well. You can't mop this problem away. The contamination is inside the mat.

Increased Weight and Handling Difficulty

A mat that absorbs moisture gets heavier over time. In environments where mats are lifted for regular floor cleaning, a waterlogged mat becomes a manual handling hazard — workers lift what they expect to be a 12-pound mat and it's now 18 pounds.

Accelerated Material Degradation

Moisture inside a mat's foam core softens the cell walls and accelerates compression set. A mat that might otherwise last 18 months goes flat in 8–10 because the internal structure is literally dissolving.

Slip Risk on the Underside

When moisture penetrates to the bottom, it reduces friction between mat and floor. The mat starts migrating during use — creating exactly the trip-and-fall hazard it was supposed to prevent.

Why One-Piece Construction Matters More Than Surface Coating

Many competitors apply a waterproof topcoat to a foam or rubber core. This works temporarily — but the topcoat is a separate layer bonded to the core, and bond integrity degrades under daily heat, moisture, chemicals, and flex. Once the topcoat develops micro-cracks, moisture has a direct path into the core.

WellnessMats uses a single continuous piece of polyurethane — surface to base. There is no topcoat, no lamination boundary, no seams, and no adhesive layer that can fail. The material is inherently moisture-impermeable at every point.

Ask your supplier: "What is the AATCC 197 vertical wicking measurement for your finished product?" If the answer is anything above 0.0 mm, that mat will eventually absorb moisture. It's not a question of if — it's when.
ASTM D751 / ASTM D2261

Adhesion & Tear Strength

Surface bond integrity and resistance to tear propagation.

TestSupremeConnect
Coating Adhesion (lbf)4.584.64
Tear — Lengthwise (lbf)15.4517.85
Tear — Widthwise (lbf)13.6113.53
Surfaces are permanently bonded through one-piece polyurethane construction — not glued as with lesser PVC or foam mats.

Why Multi-Layer Mats Delaminate

Adhesive Bonding

The most common and cheapest method. The surface layer is glued to the foam core. Adhesive bonds degrade under heat, moisture, cleaning chemicals, and mechanical flex. In commercial environments where all four conditions exist simultaneously, adhesive-bonded mats can begin delaminating in as little as 6 months.

Heat Welding

Better than adhesive, but still creates a discrete bond line between two different materials. The bond is only as strong as the weaker material, and thermal cycling stresses the weld zone over time.

Mechanical Bonding

The textured pattern on some rubber mats is mechanically pressed into the surface. Under repeated foot traffic, the pattern wears down and separates because there's no chemical bond — just friction holding it in place.

Why Our Results Are Different

WellnessMats are manufactured from a single continuous pour of polyurethane. The surface and the core are the same material, formed in one process. The "adhesion" value we report is effectively the material's internal cohesive strength — how hard it is to tear the material apart from itself.

Delamination requires two layers to exist. When there's only one material, the failure mode doesn't exist.

Tear Strength: The Other Half

ASTM D2261 measures how much force it takes to propagate a tear once initiated. At 15–18 lbf, a surface nick from a dropped tool or cart wheel doesn't spread into a rip. The mat continues to function normally even after minor surface damage.

What to look for: Examine a competitor mat's edge profile. If you can see distinct layers — a surface coating visibly different from the core — that mat has a delamination risk, regardless of adhesion test results. The question isn't whether the bond is strong today; it's whether it survives a year of chemical exposure, temperature variation, and 80,000 footfalls.

ASTM D4157 — WYZENBEEK

Surface Abrasion Resistance

10,000 Wyzenbeek cycles using #10 cotton duck abradant.

MetricSupremeConnect
Pilling ResistanceClass 5.0Class 5.0
Color ChangeClass 3.5Class 3.5–4.0
Scale: 5 = No change · 4 = Slight · 3 = Moderate · 2 = Severe · 1 = Very Severe
Zero pilling through 10,000 cycles confirms excellent surface integrity.

Why Pilling Matters More Than It Sounds

Reduced Slip Resistance

A pilled surface changes the friction profile of the mat. The raised fiber balls create an uneven micro-texture that behaves differently than the engineered surface, particularly when wet. Pilled surfaces often show lower wet COF than the original.

Accelerated Contamination

Pilled areas trap dirt, grease, and cleaning residue in the raised texture. The mat becomes progressively harder to clean because contaminants are embedded in a rough surface rather than sitting on a smooth one. In food service and healthcare, that's a sanitation concern.

Indicator of Broader Surface Failure

Pilling at 10,000 cycles often predicts cracking, flaking, or delamination at 20,000–50,000 cycles. It's an early warning sign that the surface coating isn't bonded well enough to survive extended use.

What Poor Abrasion Looks Like in Practice

Walk into any facility that's had its mats for more than a year. Look at the standing zone — the area directly in front of the workstation. On a mat with poor abrasion resistance you'll see:

Whitening or discoloration where the topcoat has been worn through, exposing the lighter-colored foam core beneath.

Surface roughness that catches on shoe soles and feels gritty underfoot.

Visible wear pattern with a clear boundary between the abused standing zone and the unused edges.

When evaluating mats, ask for Wyzenbeek data at 10,000 cycles minimum. Class 4+ on pilling is acceptable for commercial use. Class 5 means the surface is effectively abrasion-proof. Below Class 3 means visible degradation within the first year.

If the manufacturer can't provide Wyzenbeek data, pick up the mat and rub the surface firmly with your thumb 20 times. If you see any material transfer, surface whitening, or raised fibers, that surface won't survive 10,000 footfalls — let alone 10,000 Wyzenbeek cycles.

WellnessMats
Advanced Polyurethane Technology

Proven Performance.
Made In The USA.
10 Year Warranty.

14 ASTM & AATCC tests. A2LA-accredited laboratory.

Real data behind every claim.

Precision Testing Laboratories, Nashville, TN · A2LA Certificate #7327.01 · Reports 61065 & 61066 · Feb 26, 2026